BEST-OF · 2026

Best ATS for teams that hire both hourly and salaried roles (2026)

Mixed-workforce hiring is awkward because the two sides reward different things. Hourly roles need short mobile applications, SMS, quick screening and enough applicant flow; salaried roles need scorecards, interview kits, reporting and hiring-manager collaboration. We picked broad ATS platforms that can support both jobs rather than pure hourly systems. If almost all your hiring is frontline or shift-based, you should also assess purpose-built hourly tools such as Workstream or Fountain. The tools below follow ATSLab’s fixed index order, so the ranking stays consistent with our wider ATS scoring. Breezy HR is the first pick for smaller mixed teams, Workable suits sourcing-heavy teams with public pricing, and Greenhouse belongs on the enterprise shortlist when structure matters more than cost.

Tested by the ATSLab review panel · how we score · Last updated June 2026 · affiliate disclosure

PICK

Breezy HR 92/100 · EXCEPTIONAL EDITOR'S CHOICE

Breezy HR is the ATS we would point most startups and small businesses to first, and not from a spreadsheet comparison — we have run our own hiring at Venture Harbour on it for more than five years. It does the fundamentals exceptionally well, the pricing is fair, and the automation saves real time once it is set up.

✓ PROS

Unlimited users and candidates on every paid plan
Drag-and-drop pipeline that anyone can use day one
Stage-triggered automation for rejection emails and screening

✕ CONS

The advanced automation has a real learning curve
Mobile app does less than the desktop version

Best for: Startups and small businesses that want a capable ATS without per-seat fees

INDEX 92/100

Ease of use9.0/10

PricingFlat-rate pricing

HighlightUnlimited users

$157/mo

Try free ↗ Read full review →

PICK

Ashby 90/100 · EXCEPTIONAL BEST FOR SCALING

Ashby is one of the few platforms that genuinely combines an ATS, a CRM, scheduling and deep analytics in a single product without feeling like four tools bolted together. Most vendors that claim this are stitching acquisitions; Ashby built it as one system, and you feel that when you move between recruiting and reporting.

✓ PROS

ATS, CRM, scheduling and analytics in a single, coherent product
Best-in-class analytics with genuinely actionable data
Strong automation and sourcing tooling

✕ CONS

Steep learning curve and weeks of onboarding
No free tier

Best for: Scaling teams hiring at volume who want one platform for ATS, CRM and analytics

INDEX 90/100

Ease of use7.8/10

PricingCustom pricing

HighlightATS + CRM + analytics

$400/mo

Book a demo ↗ Read full review →

PICK

RC Recruit CRM 89/100 · EXCEPTIONAL BEST FOR AGENCIES

Recruit CRM is the agency tool we would shortlist first for most staffing firms. It is not just an applicant tracker with a CRM tab bolted on — the product is built around clients, contacts, jobs, submissions and candidate pipelines, which is the workflow agencies actually live in.

✓ PROS

Strong ATS and CRM in one agency-native workflow
Email sequencing and automation for recruiter follow-up
Client portals for submissions and feedback

✕ CONS

Per-seat pricing climbs quickly across a full desk
No free plan

Best for: Recruiting agencies that want ATS, client CRM, outreach and client portals in one system

INDEX 89/100

Ease of use8.7/10

PricingPer-seat pricing

HighlightATS + CRM + portals

$85/user/mo

Book a demo ↗ Read full review →

PICK

Manatal 88/100 · EXCEPTIONAL BEST VALUE AI

Manatal is the best bang-for-your-buck ATS on the market right now. It starts around $15 per user per month on an annual plan, and for that you get AI candidate scoring, an AI interviewer and access to a candidate database north of 600 million profiles. That feature-to-price ratio is not close to anything else here.

✓ PROS

Best value of any ATS on this list
AI candidate scoring and an AI interviewer
600M+ candidate database to source from

✕ CONS

Reporting is basic compared with Ashby or Workable
Limited customization and a smaller integration ecosystem

Best for: Agencies and small teams who want AI sourcing and scoring at the lowest credible price

INDEX 88/100

Ease of use8.8/10

PricingPer-seat pricing

Highlight600M candidate DB

$15/user/mo

Start free trial ↗ Read full review →

PICK

Workable 86/100 · EXCELLENT BEST SOURCING

Workable is a mature platform with features that go beyond a lot of the ATS field, and its standout is sourcing. The 400 million-plus candidate database is genuinely searchable — by skill, role, company, location — rather than a number on a marketing page. If your bottleneck is finding good people rather than tracking the ones who apply, that database earns its keep.

✓ PROS

400M+ candidate database, searchable by skill, role and company
Mature, well-rounded ATS with features beyond most rivals
Strong job-board distribution

✕ CONS

Baseline price has crept up
Texting and video interviews are paid add-ons

Best for: Scaling teams whose bottleneck is finding candidates, not tracking them

INDEX 86/100

Ease of use8.4/10

PricingFlat-rate tiers

Highlight400M candidate DB

$299/mo

Start free trial ↗ Read full review →

PICK

Rf Recruiterflow 86/100 · EXCELLENT

Recruiterflow is an agency ATS and CRM for teams that want automation to do more of the repetitive work. Its recipes are the headline: reusable automations for follow-ups, candidate nurture, status changes and client updates that help a desk run the same process every time.

✓ PROS

Strong automation recipes for repeatable recruiter workflows
ATS and CRM built for agencies rather than HR teams
Good email sequencing and candidate nurture

✕ CONS

Three-seat minimum raises the real entry cost
Per-user pricing gets expensive as the team grows

Best for: Recruiting agencies that want automation-heavy ATS and CRM workflows

INDEX 86/100

Ease of use8.4/10

PricingPer-seat pricing

HighlightAutomation recipes

$99/user/mo

Book a demo ↗ Read full review →

PICK

Teamtailor 85/100 · EXCELLENT BEST EMPLOYER BRANDING

If employer branding is a strategic priority for you, Teamtailor is the clear winner. Its no-code career-site builder is the best on this list by some distance, and a careers page that actually looks like your brand — rather than a generic ATS subdomain — is a real competitive advantage when you are fighting for candidates.

✓ PROS

Best no-code career-site builder on this list
A genuine competitive advantage for employer branding
Polished, modern candidate experience

✕ CONS

12-month minimum contract
You need a sales call to get pricing

Best for: Scaling teams that compete for talent on employer brand and candidate experience

INDEX 85/100

Ease of use8.2/10

PricingJob-slot pricing

HighlightNo-code career site

From ~$2.75k/yr

Book a demo ↗ Read full review →

PICK

BambooHR 84/100 · EXCELLENT BEST HR + ATS

BambooHR is the Swiss Army knife of hiring and managing employees. It is a true end-to-end HR system with an ATS built in, so the same platform that tracks an applicant also runs their onboarding, their records and the rest of their time at the company. For a small or mid-size business, having one system instead of two is worth a lot.

✓ PROS

True end-to-end HR plus ATS in one platform
Excellent onboarding workflows that follow the new hire
Clean hand-off from applicant to employee record

✕ CONS

ATS depth is limited for high-volume recruiting
Pricing scales per employee

Best for: Small and mid-size companies that want hiring and HR in a single system

INDEX 84/100

Ease of use8.5/10

PricingPer-employee pricing

HighlightEnd-to-end HR + ATS

From ~$250/mo

Book a demo ↗ Read full review →

COMPARE NEXT

All ATS comparisons → Breezy HR vs Workable →Ashby vs Greenhouse →

At a glance

Tool	Index	Ease of use	From	Free	Best for
Breezy HR	92	9.0	$157/mo	✓	Startups and small businesses that want a capable ATS without per-seat fees
Ashby	90	7.8	$400/mo	—	Scaling teams hiring at volume who want one platform for ATS, CRM and analytics
Recruit CRM	89	8.7	$85/user/mo	—	Recruiting agencies that want ATS, client CRM, outreach and client portals in one system
Manatal	88	8.8	$15/user/mo	—	Agencies and small teams who want AI sourcing and scoring at the lowest credible price
Workable	86	8.4	$299/mo	—	Scaling teams whose bottleneck is finding candidates, not tracking them
Recruiterflow	86	8.4	$99/user/mo	—	Recruiting agencies that want automation-heavy ATS and CRM workflows
Teamtailor	85	8.2	From ~$2.75k/yr	—	Scaling teams that compete for talent on employer brand and candidate experience
BambooHR	84	8.5	From ~$250/mo	—	Small and mid-size companies that want hiring and HR in a single system

HOW TO CHOOSE

Choosing the right tool

Split the workflow before you compare tools. Hourly hiring needs mobile-friendly applications, SMS and fast screening; salaried hiring needs structured interviews, scorecards and clear hiring-manager feedback.

Do the SMS maths early. Breezy HR’s SMS/Text Messaging add-on starts with credits from $41/month, while Workable’s Texting+ is an add-on on Standard and included on Premier and Enterprise.

Treat AI as a metered cost. Breezy Intelligence credits start at $30 per 100,000 credits, and Workable includes 3,000 AI credits before charging for larger bundles.

Check job-board reach against role type. Workable includes distribution to 200+ boards, while Breezy HR’s Bootstrap plan includes 50+ boards but only one active position or pool.

Do not sacrifice structure for speed. Salaried roles still need interview kits, scorecards, reporting and a clear decision record, especially once several managers are involved.

Use Greenhouse for governance-heavy hiring, not budget hourly volume. Its Core, Plus and Pro plans focus on structured hiring, reporting, SSO, automation and enterprise controls, with custom pricing from ATSLab recorded at from ~$6k.

FAQ

What is the best ATS for teams that hire both hourly and salaried roles?

Breezy HR is the best first shortlist pick if you are a small business that wants a capable mixed-role ATS from $157/month on annual billing. Workable is stronger if applicant flow, job-board reach and sourcing are the bottleneck. Greenhouse is the better fit for larger teams that need structured interviews, governance and reporting more than low-cost hourly speed.

Is Workable better than Breezy HR for hourly hiring?

Workable can be the better fit if you need 200+ job boards, mobile-friendly applications, custom application forms, Indeed Easy Apply and Apply with LinkedIn. Breezy HR ranks higher in ATSLab’s index and is usually the better small-business value, but active hourly hiring may need paid SMS and AI credits.

Can Greenhouse work for hourly and salaried hiring?

Greenhouse can support mixed hiring, especially where salaried roles need scorecards, structured interview kits, reporting, SSO and enterprise controls. The catch is fit and cost: Greenhouse uses custom pricing, ATSLab records it from ~$6k, and it is less obviously hourly-first than purpose-built frontline systems.

Do we need a dedicated hourly hiring platform instead of a general ATS?

If hourly roles dominate and you need text-to-apply, rapid screening, scheduling links or frontline-specific workflows, shortlist hourly-focused systems as well. If you hire both hourly and salaried roles, a broader ATS usually makes more sense because it balances speed with structured evaluation.