A ATSLab
Find your ATS
HEAD TO HEAD

Greenhouse vs Lever: which ATS wins?

Last updated 2026-06-09 · all ATS comparisons · best ATS rankings

Greenhouse logo
Greenhouse
Enterprise
72
/100
★ 7.6 ease of use From ~$6k/yr Custom pricing
Book a demo ↗
Read review → Pricing →
★ OUR PICK
Lever logo
Lever
Enterprise
84
/100
★ 7.8 ease of use From ~$4k/yr Custom pricing
Book a demo ↗
Read review → Pricing →
Affiliate link · how we make money
THE SHORT ANSWER

Greenhouse wins on structured-hiring rigour, integrations and customization. Lever wins for proactive teams nurturing passive talent through its CRM and sequences. Choose by whether your hiring is reactive (Greenhouse) or relationship-led (Lever).

CHOOSE GREENHOUSE IF

Enterprises that want the deepest structured-hiring platform and can fund it. It starts at from ~$6k/yr and is strongest for 500+ integrations.

Greenhouse review → Greenhouse pricing →
CHOOSE LEVER IF

Enterprise teams that hire proactively and nurture passive candidates over time. It starts at from ~$4k/yr and is strongest for ats + talent crm.

Lever review → Lever pricing →

Side-by-side specs

Greenhouse logoGreenhouse Lever logoLever
Index Score 72/100 84/100
Ease of use 7.6/10 7.8/10
Price from From ~$6k/yr From ~$4k/yr
Free plan No No
Pricing model Custom pricing Custom pricing
Highlight 500+ integrations ATS + talent CRM
Sourcing & DB No No
Integrations & API Yes Yes
Branded career site Yes Yes

Side-by-side pricing

Greenhouse and Lever public tiers and estimated annual costs
Pricing detail Greenhouse logoGreenhouse pricing Lever logoLever pricing
Pricing model Per-employee Custom
Public tier 1 Greenhouse Recruiting
custom quote · customQuote-based and scales by employee count.
LeverTRM
custom quote · customAnnual contracts; ATS and CRM packaging varies by quote.
Cheapest realistic annual cost ~$6,500 ~$6,000
Real cost band 1 Small teams
~$6,500
Small teams
~$6,000
Real cost band 2 Mid-market
$15,000-$40,000
Mid-market
$20,000-$60,000
Real cost band 3 Enterprise
$70,000+
Enterprise
$144,000+
Last verified 2026-07-02 2026-07-02

Round by round

Pipeline & ease of use Winner: Lever
Lever has the more intuitive pipeline (7.8 vs 7.6 for ease of use).
Price Winner: Lever
Lever is cheaper to start (From ~$4k/yr vs From ~$6k/yr). Confirm current pricing on each vendor's site.
Sourcing & reach Winner: Greenhouse
Greenhouse has the stronger sourcing and candidate reach.
Collaboration & reporting Winner: Greenhouse
Greenhouse offers deeper collaboration and reporting.

FAQ

Is Greenhouse better than Lever?

Greenhouse wins on structured-hiring rigour, integrations and customization. Lever wins for proactive teams nurturing passive talent through its CRM and sequences. Choose by whether your hiring is reactive (Greenhouse) or relationship-led (Lever).

Greenhouse vs Lever: which is cheaper?

Lever is cheaper to start, from From ~$4k/yr versus From ~$6k/yr. Pricing is approximate — confirm on each vendor's site.

Greenhouse vs Lever: which is easier to use?

Lever scored higher for ease of use in our editorial assessment (7.8 vs 7.6 out of 10).

Where can I compare Greenhouse and Lever with other ATS tools?

Use the ATS comparison hub for more head-to-heads, or the best ATS rankings to compare Greenhouse, Lever and other tools by score, price and use case.