A ATSLab
Find your ATS
HEAD TO HEAD

Ashby vs Lever: which ATS wins?

Last updated 2026-06-09 · all ATS comparisons · best ATS rankings

★ OUR PICK
Ashby logo
Ashby
Scaling teams
90
/100
★ 7.8 ease of use $400/mo Custom pricing
Book a demo ↗
Read review → Pricing →
Lever logo
Lever
Enterprise
84
/100
★ 7.8 ease of use From ~$4k/yr Custom pricing
Book a demo ↗
Read review → Pricing →
Affiliate link · how we make money
THE SHORT ANSWER

Ashby wins for scaling teams that want ATS, CRM, scheduling and serious analytics in one system from about $400/mo for smaller companies. Lever wins when passive-candidate nurture and recruiter CRM workflows matter more than reporting depth, but expect custom annual pricing from roughly $6k/yr upward.

CHOOSE ASHBY IF

Scaling teams hiring at volume who want one platform for ATS, CRM and analytics. It starts at $400/mo and is strongest for ats + crm + analytics.

Ashby review → Ashby pricing →
CHOOSE LEVER IF

Enterprise teams that hire proactively and nurture passive candidates over time. It starts at from ~$4k/yr and is strongest for ats + talent crm.

Lever review → Lever pricing →

Side-by-side specs

Ashby logoAshby Lever logoLever
Index Score 90/100 84/100
Ease of use 7.8/10 7.8/10
Price from $400/mo From ~$4k/yr
Free plan No No
Pricing model Custom pricing Custom pricing
Highlight ATS + CRM + analytics ATS + talent CRM
Sourcing & DB Yes No
Integrations & API Yes Yes
Branded career site No Yes

Side-by-side pricing

Ashby and Lever public tiers and estimated annual costs
Pricing detail Ashby logoAshby pricing Lever logoLever pricing
Pricing model Flat-rate Custom
Public tier 1 Foundations
$400/mo · monthlyFor companies under 100 employees; about 10% off on annual billing.
LeverTRM
custom quote · customAnnual contracts; ATS and CRM packaging varies by quote.
Public tier 2 Growth/Scale
custom quote · customAnnual contracts for larger teams.
No comparable public tier
Cheapest realistic annual cost $4,320-$4,800 ~$6,000
Real cost band 1 <100 employees
$4,320-$4,800
Small teams
~$6,000
Real cost band 2 100-300 employees
$30,000-$70,000
Mid-market
$20,000-$60,000
Real cost band 3 300+ employees
$70,000+
Enterprise
$144,000+
Last verified 2026-07-02 2026-07-02

Round by round

Pipeline & ease of use Winner: Tie
Both land at 7.8/10 — too close to call on day-to-day usability.
Price Winner: Ashby
Ashby is cheaper to start ($400/mo vs From ~$4k/yr). Confirm current pricing on each vendor's site.
Sourcing & reach Winner: Lever
Lever has the stronger sourcing and candidate reach.
Collaboration & reporting Winner: Ashby
Ashby offers deeper collaboration and reporting.

FAQ

Is Ashby better than Lever?

Ashby wins for scaling teams that want ATS, CRM, scheduling and serious analytics in one system from about $400/mo for smaller companies. Lever wins when passive-candidate nurture and recruiter CRM workflows matter more than reporting depth, but expect custom annual pricing from roughly $6k/yr upward.

Ashby vs Lever: which is cheaper?

Ashby is cheaper to start, from $400/mo versus From ~$4k/yr. Pricing is approximate — confirm on each vendor's site.

Ashby vs Lever: which is easier to use?

Lever scored higher for ease of use in our editorial assessment (7.8 vs 7.8 out of 10).

Where can I compare Ashby and Lever with other ATS tools?

Use the ATS comparison hub for more head-to-heads, or the best ATS rankings to compare Ashby, Lever and other tools by score, price and use case.